Only the people of Gujrat will tell to the so called secular parties and the person like Tista that who is Secular, who is Anti Hindu , who is spreading harted in India for political gain and who is Anti National ?Anil wrote:
Who harvested whose hate in Gujarat?
The Gujarat election result will hit the
`seculars' like a thunderbolt.
They are howling
``Harvest of hate'';
``Moditva at work'';
``program on minorities'' . Days before the Gujarat elections
the secular media will virtually written off the BJP.
But the election results will proved an electric shock.
It demonstrated not just disconnect between the
`seculars' and the Hindus.
It will show that the seculars were blind
to a rising tornado of Hindu reaction.
Against not the Muslims,
but the seculars themselves.
Look at how the rising Hindu political
consciousness turned into a tornado. The Hindus saw secular parties,
media and intellectuals work in tandem.
They saw
this triumvirate even egg
on a constitutional authority like the
Election Commission
to sidestep laws to advance the cause of secularism.
They saw
a clear contrast in the EC's conduct.
EC holding elections in Kashmir amid gunfire,
but refusing to conduct elections
in Gujarat almost on flimsy grounds;
EC virtually sacrificing
the 3 lakh displaced Kashmiri Pandits
of their right to vote;
but deferring the elections in Gujarat citing
the few thousand Muslims
who were not at their usual address to vote;
EC banning the VHP yatra,
prohibiting reference to Godhra
and singling out Modi's speeches for monitoring.
They saw the media enjoy
and support every word and action of the EC.
The Hindu mind
was silently watching all this.
Now comes the election proper.
The Hindus did not hear the BJP even utter the word
Hindutva
during the campaign.
But they saw Congress engage in duplicity.
They read its Gujarati manifesto espousing
`soft' Hindutva,
with the English version the other way round.
They saw
Sonia starting her campaign at Ambaji temple,
but accusing the BJP of using religion.
They saw
the Congress party asking its Muslims leaders
not to campaign in Gujarat,
Muslim visitors to the party office
not to wear their identity cap.
They also saw 200 saffron-clad sadhus and sants
abuse the BJP as anti-Hindu party.They saw the media approve,
even encourage the duplicity.
They read the media write wrote ad-nauseum:
``Not a single Muslim will vote for the BJP.
KHAM
[meaning the 'Kshatriya, Harijan, Adivasi and Muslim]
combination will work.' '
They read the secular logic,
which proceeded thus:
that Muslims as vote bank is not just acceptable,
but imperative to protect secularism;
that different castes being persuaded to vote
on caste lines is necessary to save secularism;
but
Hindus voting as such even on
what the whole world
perceives as Islamic terrorism is
anti-secular,
communal,
even Hindutva laboratory;
so to appeal to Hindus to unite to save the nation
from Islamic terror is communal;
but
to appeal to Muslims
to defeat a party fighting Islamic terror is secular;
to recall and observe annual
'shrardh'
for Babri structure is a sacred secular duty;
but to recall the roasting of over 50 Ramsewaks
in the first election held after one of the
greatest human tragedies is not anti-secular,
but against the law of the EC. They also saw the secularists cultivate
a dangerous view among minorities.
That is, only those insensitive to majority
sentiments are secular;
that merely being appreciative of minority
sentiments is not secular enough.
The Hindus clearly saw
the secular-double standards,
their dangerous logic.
Also the one point of agenda of the seculars:
to secure the BJP's defeat at any cost. The Gujarat electorate have massively
and pointedly rejected this duplicitous,
divisive, Hindu-hate politics of seculars.
If secularism means consolidating Muslims
as ballot papers and splitting the
Hindus as this caste and that,
they thought it was their national duty to resist
such pernicious deconstruction of India.
This is precisely what the Gujarat voters have done.
They have performed a national duty. Decades back,
Gandhiji showed the way
when he staked his life to resist the
British attempt to sever the Harijans from Hindu society.
Then,
who harvested whose hate in Gujarat?
Did Modi harvest the hate the seculars created?
Or
did the seculars harvest the hate
they themselves created?-- Sriram SavarkarHinduism is more a way of life than a method of worship. Dharmo Rakshati RakshithahaIf you protect Dharma, Dharma will in turn protect you
-- "O Shirdi Sai Nath, Give me the guidance to know when to hold on and when to let go and the Grace to make right decision with dignity"
Who harvested whose hate in Gujarat?
The Gujarat election result will hit the
`seculars' like a thunderbolt.
They are howling
``Harvest of hate'';
``Moditva at work'';
``program on minorities'' . Days before the Gujarat elections
the secular media will virtually written off the BJP.
But the election results will proved an electric shock.
It demonstrated not just disconnect between the
`seculars' and the Hindus.
It will show that the seculars were blind
to a rising tornado of Hindu reaction.
Against not the Muslims,
but the seculars themselves.
Look at how the rising Hindu political
consciousness turned into a tornado. The Hindus saw secular parties,
media and intellectuals work in tandem.
They saw
this triumvirate even egg
on a constitutional authority like the
Election Commission
to sidestep laws to advance the cause of secularism.
They saw
a clear contrast in the EC's conduct.
EC holding elections in Kashmir amid gunfire,
but refusing to conduct elections
in Gujarat almost on flimsy grounds;
EC virtually sacrificing
the 3 lakh displaced Kashmiri Pandits
of their right to vote;
but deferring the elections in Gujarat citing
the few thousand Muslims
who were not at their usual address to vote;
EC banning the VHP yatra,
prohibiting reference to Godhra
and singling out Modi's speeches for monitoring.
They saw the media enjoy
and support every word and action of the EC.
The Hindu mind
was silently watching all this.
Now comes the election proper.
The Hindus did not hear the BJP even utter the word
Hindutva
during the campaign.
But they saw Congress engage in duplicity.
They read its Gujarati manifesto espousing
`soft' Hindutva,
with the English version the other way round.
They saw
Sonia starting her campaign at Ambaji temple,
but accusing the BJP of using religion.
They saw
the Congress party asking its Muslims leaders
not to campaign in Gujarat,
Muslim visitors to the party office
not to wear their identity cap.
They also saw 200 saffron-clad sadhus and sants
abuse the BJP as anti-Hindu party.They saw the media approve,
even encourage the duplicity.
They read the media write wrote ad-nauseum:
``Not a single Muslim will vote for the BJP.
KHAM
[meaning the 'Kshatriya, Harijan, Adivasi and Muslim]
combination will work.' '
They read the secular logic,
which proceeded thus:
that Muslims as vote bank is not just acceptable,
but imperative to protect secularism;
that different castes being persuaded to vote
on caste lines is necessary to save secularism;
but
Hindus voting as such even on
what the whole world
perceives as Islamic terrorism is
anti-secular,
communal,
even Hindutva laboratory;
so to appeal to Hindus to unite to save the nation
from Islamic terror is communal;
but
to appeal to Muslims
to defeat a party fighting Islamic terror is secular;
to recall and observe annual
'shrardh'
for Babri structure is a sacred secular duty;
but to recall the roasting of over 50 Ramsewaks
in the first election held after one of the
greatest human tragedies is not anti-secular,
but against the law of the EC. They also saw the secularists cultivate
a dangerous view among minorities.
That is, only those insensitive to majority
sentiments are secular;
that merely being appreciative of minority
sentiments is not secular enough.
The Hindus clearly saw
the secular-double standards,
their dangerous logic.
Also the one point of agenda of the seculars:
to secure the BJP's defeat at any cost. The Gujarat electorate have massively
and pointedly rejected this duplicitous,
divisive, Hindu-hate politics of seculars.
If secularism means consolidating Muslims
as ballot papers and splitting the
Hindus as this caste and that,
they thought it was their national duty to resist
such pernicious deconstruction of India.
This is precisely what the Gujarat voters have done.
They have performed a national duty. Decades back,
Gandhiji showed the way
when he staked his life to resist the
British attempt to sever the Harijans from Hindu society.
Then,
who harvested whose hate in Gujarat?
Did Modi harvest the hate the seculars created?
Or
did the seculars harvest the hate
they themselves created?-- Sriram SavarkarHinduism is more a way of life than a method of worship. Dharmo Rakshati RakshithahaIf you protect Dharma, Dharma will in turn protect you
-- "O Shirdi Sai Nath, Give me the guidance to know when to hold on and when to let go and the Grace to make right decision with dignity"
No comments:
Post a Comment